<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
    <channel>
        <title>Epinions Recent Reviews for pr-AMD Athlon 64 3500 512K 90nm 939 ada3500dik4b</title>
        <copyright>&#169; 1999-2009 Shopping.com, Inc. This feed is subject to our terms of use: http://www.epinions.com/help/rss_terms</copyright>
        <link>http://www.epinions.com/prices/pr-AMD_Athlon_64_3500_512K_90nm_939_ada3500dik4b</link>
        <description>Recent reviews written about pr-AMD Athlon 64 3500 512K 90nm 939 ada3500dik4b</description>
        <language>en-us</language>
        
        <item>
            <title>pr-AMD Athlon 64 3500 512K 90nm 939 ada3500dik4b: Phenomenal  Value!   Power! Compares to Low-End Dual-Cores</title>
            <link>http://www.epinions.com/review/pr-AMD_Athlon_64_3500_512K_90nm_939_ada3500dik4b/content_412568751748?linkin_id=8003929</link>
            <description>rating: 5/5 by: Epinions Author kengland4 - Special Note: This review applies to, both, the AMD 64 socket 939 3400+ (OEM-only) AND the same socket 3500+, which are identical--the 3400+ was marketed as a &quot;3500+&quot; in the popularly-available form, but both were assessed). They may be interchangeably...</description>
            <comments>http://www.epinions.com/content/submit.html/comment_~412568751748</comments>
            <pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 06:43:52 GMT</pubDate>
            <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.epinions.com/review/pr-AMD_Athlon_64_3500_512K_90nm_939_ada3500dik4b/content_412568751748?linkin_id=8003929</guid>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>